![]() The improper syntax should be included it would lead to more young people using the firefox browser, cuz even if IE7 is more CSS compliant I doubt they'll make the cursor element more strict. Many other CSS elements have implied states and I don't think it would be bad if Gecko and Firefox 1.6 supported an implied fall back state for the cursor element. ![]() Personally I think the W3C is wrong to require this, there should be a implied default state that the browser uses when one is not supplied in the CSS code. Pink mouse cursor is often found in sweets It tastes like marshmallow and chewing gum Pink cursor mania is romantic love and light flirting. IE allows cursor: url( foo.cur ) to work and display the custom cursor.īut W3C says that a fall back status must be explicitly stated inorder to display the custom cursor.įirefox 1.5 rc1 obey's the W3C standard meaning that sites that omit the fall back state because IE will show the cursor, won't show up in the Firefox browser. Cute, funky, and colorful custom cursors for Chrome Its a detailed illustration that is added instead of a default mouse pointer. Pink aesthetic mouse cursor is associated with daydreaming and belief in a fairy tale It recalls childhood and naivety, carelessness and spontaneity. Yes the url function of the cursor: has a bug, but technically it's in the way that IE interpets the code. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |